Competition Conundrum


rosenfeld


As Torah-observant Jews, we try to live up to the Halachos of lashon hara, which guide us in what is appropriate speech, especially in regards to derogatory information. However, there are numerous situations where Halacha defines what we may or may not say, even if no derogatory information is exchanged. This can especially be relevant in business.

In a previous article, we explored the Halachos of lashon hara as relating to business situations. This article will explore speech where lashon hara is not an issue. Let’s consider the following case study:

Friends and Competitors

Chaim, Pinny, and Aharon are three accountants who are friends and are starting to develop practices. The three of them have a sense for marketing their practices, and each of them is looking to develop new clients, especially within the frum community. Once February rolls around, all three advertise heavily in the frum magazines and papers.

Kalman is a potential client who notices their advertisements. Kalman is a really nice guy. He also comes from a family of 10 siblings, whom he often helps with his advice and suggestions on financial matters. Kalman has offered to help his siblings get their tax returns done by organizing their financial statements and submitting them to a CPA to prepare their returns. All his siblings have taken Kalman up on this, and he then starts making calls looking for the accountant who will do a good job at the best price.

He responds to the ads of Chaim, Pinny and Aharon, explaining to each of them that he has a big job and asks for their price for services. The three accountants ask Kalman for some basic financial statements that relate to the job. Aharon tells Kalman that the tax returns have issues that are outside his area of expertise. However, Chaim and Pinny both want the job. Chaim tells Kalman that he will do the job for $4,000. Pinny then asks Kalman what estimates he has received for the job. When Kalman tells Pinny about the estimate he got from Chaim for $4,000, Pinny says he will do it for $3,500. Kalman then goes back to Chaim.  Chaim says he will also do the job for $3,500, and will throw in some tax planning services during the year as well. Kalman then commits to give Chaim the job.

Pinny still wishes to solicit Kalman’s business, but upon hearing that he already committed to Chaim, he is unsure if this is right and proper to do, and goes to seek Rabbinical guidance for the Halachic parameters pertaining to competing for the same client.

This situation is one example of a common question about how Halacha views fair competition. More specifically, the question here is what is appropriate when trying so solicit clients when a competing practitioner wants the same clients.

One point to make is that the Halachos of lashon hara always apply – meaning there is never grounds for one practitioner to say anything negative about a competitor. Although lashon hara is permitted for the sake of toeles – a positive purpose for the lashon hara[1] – that dispensation would not apply to competitors. It is inevitable that a competitor who says something negative about another competitor is a biased party and does not have the proper intention that would allow the lashon hara to be shared in certain other cases.

The Halachic Analysis

The main question here is whether a competitor can sell his own services through offering a better price, extra services, or something else additional to the potential client for the sake of getting clients that would go elsewhere. There are a few variables that affect the Halacha:

1) Has the client made a commitment to the practitioner?

Since in this case Kalman already made a commitment to Chaim, Pinny is not allowed to try to get Kalman as a client. This comes under the Halachic concept called “Ani Mehapech B’Charara.”[2] The idea behind this Halacha is that once the client and practitioner (Kalman and Chaim) have finalized the terms of the deal between them, then another practitioner (such as Pinny) can not try to take the deal away. This applies even when the parties have not formally signed a contract, as long as they have come to an agreement on the terms of with the deal.

2) Has this client been a regular with the practitioner in past years?

Even had Kalman not yet made a commitment to Chaim, if Kalman was a satisfied client of Chaim’s from previous years and had not been looking for other accountants instead, then Pinny would not be allowed to lure Kalman away to become his client. In a certain sense, the Halacha views Kalman as “belonging” to Chaim. Therefore, if Chaim had already been doing Kalman’s tax returns in past years, then Pinny may not try to take Kalman away.

However, in our case, since Kalman was actively comparing accountants and he initially called Pinny as well, Pinny would be permitted to try to solicit Kalman had he not yet come to an agreement with Chaim.

Black-and-White or Gray?

Some situations lend themselves to a gray area, in which it may not be clear if the client has already made a commitment or if he was a loyal client of one of them. In case the parties are not able to resolve the issue themselves, they should seek Rabbinical guidance. There may be other Halachic considerations that are relevant as well.

Additional Applications

It should be emphasized that the Halachic principles explained in this article regarding competitors vying for the same client have many other applications as well.

For instance, when employers are searching for qualified employees, they may not lure an employee away from a company in which he is currently working, but may give offers to an employee who is looking for work, until he accepts an offer that he is satisfied with.

Similarly, when prospective home buyers are interested in purchasing the same property that was put up for sale, they may each make offers and attempt to negotiate a deal only up until the point that the seller comes to an agreement with one of them. Once he accepts an offer that he is satisfied with, other prospective buyers are not allowed to try to undo that deal by offering a higher bid.

We daven that Hashem should help us with integrity in our speech, not just regarding lashon hara but in all areas of honesty. We also daven that Hashem should bring us the proper parnassa for our family through means that are in keeping with the Torah values of business ethics.

 

Rabbi Rosenfeld administers cases for the Baltimore Bais Din. He may be reached at RYR@baltimorebaisdin.org.

 



[1] The details of the Halachos of toeles were discussed in a previous article in the WWW January 2021 issue. See www.wherewhatwhen.com.

[2] This topic was discussed at length in the February 2020 issue of WWW.

comments powered by Disqus